The BBC is not an island unto itself

Is that the echo of hollow laughter I hear? Why yes, it’s the sound of commercial broadcasters sniggering over BBC Trust chairman Sir Michael Lyons’ impassioned defence of the licence fee’s integrity.

Apparently, Sir Michael doesn’t believe in top-slicing it, not for Channel 4 or anyone else. And he’s prepared to die in a ditch over it.

Well, he would say that sort of thing, wouldn’t he? When have turkeys ever voted for Christmas, after all? But before we get carried away with smug self-satisfaction at the BBC’s dilemma, let’s at least concede that he has a point in flagging up the public interest.

Well padded and complacent the BBC may be, but the commercial sector is, and always has been, incapable of supplying the deficit. Innovations, such as iPlayer, have come about precisely because the BBC can take a longer view on product development, unbeholden to the quarterly earnings obsession of institutional shareholders.

Lyons fears that top-slicing and David Cameron’s proposal to first freeze then review the licence fee annually (instead of five-yearly) amount to the same thing: an assault on its status as something quite distinct from general taxation. Once the licence fee becomes simply a means of raising money for other purposes, it will be death for the BBC  by a thousand cuts (and subsidies). Not unlike the way a substantial portion of National Lottery revenues is finding its way into underpinning London 2012, as opposed to the good causes which are a fundamental part of its charter.

Slow financial emasculation is bad enough, but the Cameron plan hints at a darker agenda. It may well open the way to overt political interference in the BBC’s news agenda. Would you trust the central cast in our House of Frauds drama to play fair over news values? That’s a rhetorical question.

About these ads

One Response to The BBC is not an island unto itself

  1. [...] for an easy raid. And when they do get round to plundering the licence fee, what will be the consequences for BBC, the world-beating brand? Not good, for sure. More on this in the column this [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 473 other followers

%d bloggers like this: